Regular routes are believed to have been first laid down or used in the Neolithic period of the Stone Age. Before that, man had been a hunter and his movements were governed by the movements of his prey. These might even have followed migratory patterns as animals moved from summer to winter grazing or hunting grounds and back again. But now man's life-style was becoming comparatively more sophisticated as he became more sophisticated as he became more self-reliant, choosing to farm rather than hunt and this brought about more permanent settlements and a more settled way of life. Travel was now for a different purpose. To trade for salt or flint, to fight, to expand his territory or knowledge of his area.
His travelling would now be done in a more logical manner and might even have had a religious or superstitious basis. What is important to remember is that Neolithic man did not have a road system to follow. The traveller in those times had to ensure he had made mental notes of the distance travelled, the direction and the salient features of his route. After all, he had to find his way back again!
We are taught at school that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. The theory of straight line travel is interesting. Most people with average balance can walk in a straight line with their eyes closed. There is also a theory that there is a virtually redundant part of the human brain that acts as a compass by detecting the earth's magnetic field and that such a part is still very much active in some species such as migrating birds and large aquatic animals.
I doubt whether prehistoric man or pigeon ever knew which direction they were travelling in relation to a compass, but I am sure that they both knew when they were straying from their initial line, such deviation being sensed by balance, which is necessary when turning left or right and by the brain's magnetic sensor when deviating from a given line at a slower rate.
If one can imagine being the first person to go into a specific area with no previous knowledge of that area, one can imagine how ley lines might have been formed. A man in that position would automatically head from high ground to high ground so as to get the maximum views of the countryside for the simple reason it gave him fore-knowledge of what might be in his path, such as lakes, rivers or other natural features which might hinder or help him in his progress.
As he became more familiar with the territory, he might have supplemented his surveying with signs of his own, such as mounds of earth or stone, earthen walls he might build for his own security or shelter, clearings where he might make a temporary home and as an area became more populated, so the number of places of importance would increase and subsequently, the number of ley lines.
Tuesday 10 March 2009
Wednesday 18 February 2009
Leylines: a history and theory
The following is extracted from an article originally written by Tim Carrington (I believe from the Shropshire area). I have tried to contact him to get permission to copy, but have had no success in tracing him or his family. Therefore the least I can do is credit him.
Towards the end of 1921, Alfred Watkins first made public his theory about Ley Lines. His first major work on the subject was published in 1925 and the book which led to my fascination with the subject, 'The Ley Hunter's Manual', was first published in 1927.
Up until reading that book, my knowledge of Ley Lines was vague. I thought that basically they were lines on which places of importance had been built in ancient times; and my own theory was that they probably followed lines of magnetic strength in the earth's surface.
Whilst researching places in Shropshire, I kept turning up references to Ley Lines. Buildwas Abbey was on a Ley Line. Much Wenlock Priory was on a Ley Line and Bitterley Church had a cross in its churchyard with a hole for a Ley Line. Each of these references were found in different books, although there is the possibility that their respective author's source was common. The intriguing point is that if you place a ruler on a map of Shropshire those three points are on a single line!
Coincidence? Proof? I honestly did not know. But sitting and staring at the map, I wondered which way the hole ran through the shaft of that cross in Bitterley churchyard. Now if that hole lay on the same line or bearing as Much Wenlock and Buildwas which lie some twenty miles away, could it still be passed off as coincidence? I resolved to go to Bitterley and check, but first I wanted to know more about these mysterious lines.
Towards the end of 1921, Alfred Watkins first made public his theory about Ley Lines. His first major work on the subject was published in 1925 and the book which led to my fascination with the subject, 'The Ley Hunter's Manual', was first published in 1927.
Up until reading that book, my knowledge of Ley Lines was vague. I thought that basically they were lines on which places of importance had been built in ancient times; and my own theory was that they probably followed lines of magnetic strength in the earth's surface.
Whilst researching places in Shropshire, I kept turning up references to Ley Lines. Buildwas Abbey was on a Ley Line. Much Wenlock Priory was on a Ley Line and Bitterley Church had a cross in its churchyard with a hole for a Ley Line. Each of these references were found in different books, although there is the possibility that their respective author's source was common. The intriguing point is that if you place a ruler on a map of Shropshire those three points are on a single line!
Coincidence? Proof? I honestly did not know. But sitting and staring at the map, I wondered which way the hole ran through the shaft of that cross in Bitterley churchyard. Now if that hole lay on the same line or bearing as Much Wenlock and Buildwas which lie some twenty miles away, could it still be passed off as coincidence? I resolved to go to Bitterley and check, but first I wanted to know more about these mysterious lines.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
